Bug 203635
| Summary: | openjade internal libs .la and .so symlinks should be removed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
| Component: | openjade | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 1.3.2-28.fc7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-02-09 11:41:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 150225, 226213 | ||
|
Description
Patrice Dumas
2006-08-22 19:46:05 UTC
The only obstacle to this is that there isn't a devel subpackage at the moment. Since there is no header maybe these are internal libs and the .so shouldn't be packaged. Or maybe they are dlopened by something? (By the way the .la should be removed, I guess) What is wrong with removing the .so (and .la)? Fixed in 1.3.2-28.fc7. |