Bug 203635 - openjade internal libs .la and .so symlinks should be removed
Summary: openjade internal libs .la and .so symlinks should be removed
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openjade   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Waugh
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC7Target 226213
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-08-22 19:46 UTC by Patrice Dumas
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: 1.3.2-28.fc7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-09 11:41:39 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-08-22 19:46:05 UTC 
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

The .so files (libostyle.so...) should be in -devel

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2006-08-23 12:03:01 UTC 
The only obstacle to this is that there isn't a devel subpackage at the moment.
Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2006-08-23 12:08:40 UTC 
Since there is no header maybe these are internal libs and the .so 
shouldn't be packaged.

Or maybe they are dlopened by something?

(By the way the .la should be removed, I guess)
Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2006-11-17 14:37:39 UTC 
What is wrong with removing the .so (and .la)?
Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2007-02-09 11:41:39 UTC 
Fixed in 1.3.2-28.fc7.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.