Bug 2037591
| Summary: | Please branch and build exim in epel9. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Renich Bon Ciric <renich> |
| Component: | exim | Assignee: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | bennie.joubert, dwmw2, jskarvad |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | exim-4.95-3.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-04-21 20:40:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2038095, 2038097, 2038098, 2054125 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Renich Bon Ciric
2022-01-06 03:03:10 UTC
Branched, but it's missing some deps which are not in RHEL-9, so it cannot be built in the current state: DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'libgsasl-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'libopendmarc-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'libspf2-devel' (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2) > DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'libgsasl-devel' Bug 2038095 (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2) > DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'libopendmarc-devel' Bug 2038097 (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2) > DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'libspf2-devel' Bug 2038098 Any news on this one? Waiting for the libgsasl, it seems it requires some more deps, see bug 2038095 for details. Maybe I could build exim without libgsasl, but I cannot help with the libgsasl itself. Thank you for the explanation Jeroslav. I hope it gets sorted out. It seems libgsasl is required for authentication. https://www.gnu.org/software/gsasl/ You know this most probably. I dunno the implications of building it without it. I found this, though: https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-the_gsasl_authenticator.html And it seems it's not being used yet: > The library is expected to add support in an upcoming realease for the SCRAM-SHA-256 method. The macro _HAVE_AUTH_GSASL_SCRAM_SHA_256 will be defined when this happens. It seems all blockers have been resolved. Is it possible to continue now? FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |