Bug 2037591 - Please branch and build exim in epel9.
Summary: Please branch and build exim in epel9.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: exim
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2038095 2038097 2038098 2054125
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-01-06 03:03 UTC by Renich Bon Ciric
Modified: 2022-04-21 20:40 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: exim-4.95-3.el9
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-04-21 20:40:42 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Renich Bon Ciric 2022-01-06 03:03:10 UTC

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-01-06 19:32:31 UTC
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40564

Comment 2 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-01-07 09:25:01 UTC
Branched, but it's missing some deps which are not in RHEL-9, so it cannot be built in the current state:
DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'libgsasl-devel'
DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'libopendmarc-devel'
DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'libspf2-devel'

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-01-07 09:30:42 UTC
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'libgsasl-devel'
Bug 2038095

Comment 4 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-01-07 09:38:04 UTC
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'libopendmarc-devel'
Bug 2038097

Comment 5 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-01-07 09:39:51 UTC
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> DEBUG util.py:444:  No matching package to install: 'libspf2-devel'
Bug 2038098

Comment 6 Renich Bon Ciric 2022-03-12 06:58:14 UTC
Any news on this one?

Comment 7 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-03-12 11:09:07 UTC
Waiting for the libgsasl, it seems it requires some more deps, see bug 2038095 for details. Maybe I could build exim without libgsasl, but I cannot help with the libgsasl itself.

Comment 8 Renich Bon Ciric 2022-03-14 16:58:21 UTC
Thank you for the explanation Jeroslav. I hope it gets sorted out. It seems libgsasl is required for authentication. 

https://www.gnu.org/software/gsasl/

You know this most probably. I dunno the implications of building it without it. I found this, though: 

https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-the_gsasl_authenticator.html

And it seems it's not being used yet:

> The library is expected to add support in an upcoming realease for the SCRAM-SHA-256 method. The macro _HAVE_AUTH_GSASL_SCRAM_SHA_256 will be defined when this happens.

Comment 9 Renich Bon Ciric 2022-04-13 16:57:35 UTC
It seems all blockers have been resolved. Is it possible to continue now?

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-04-14 12:56:38 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-04-14 16:34:32 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2022-04-21 20:40:42 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b98b465710 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.