Bug 2043541
Summary: | Review Request: module-build - A library and a cli tool for building module streams | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Martin Curlej <mcurlej> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jkadlcik, package-review, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jkadlcik:
fedora-review?
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2024-12-19 08:47:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Martin Curlej
2022-01-21 13:45:15 UTC
Please retitle the bug. Hello Martin, thank you for the package. > Version: 0.1.0 There is already 0.2.1 on GitHub, can you please update? > Summary: Tool/library for building module streams locally. A summary shouldn't end with a period. > Source0: https://github.com/mcurlej/module-build/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz You can do Source0: %{URL}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz to make the line shorter. > %description > A library and a cli tool for building module streams. Can you please write 2-3 sentences about the package? > %check > %pytest The tests are failing in Mock, can you please take a look? > Tue Feb 01 2022 Martin Čurlej <mcurlej> - 0.1.0-1 It may be a good idea to go without the special characters This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. I am interested in reviewing this ticket but there is no response from the contributor. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. I think we can close this. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireModularity and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWM-4300 mean any tools related to modularity are unlikely to be useful. |