Bug 2043541

Summary: Review Request: module-build - A library and a cli tool for building module streams
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Martin Curlej <mcurlej>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik>
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jkadlcik, package-review, zbyszek
Target Milestone: ---Flags: jkadlcik: fedora-review?
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-12-19 08:47:08 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Martin Curlej 2022-01-21 13:45:15 UTC
Spec URL: https://mcurlej.fedorapeople.org/module-build.spec
SRPM URL: https://mcurlej.fedorapeople.org/module-build-0.1.0-1.fc34.src.rpm
Description: A library and a cli tool for building module streams. 
Fedora Account System Username: mcurlej

Comment 1 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2022-01-26 21:42:00 UTC
Please retitle the bug.

Comment 2 Jakub Kadlčík 2022-12-14 19:39:21 UTC
Hello Martin,
thank you for the package.


> Version: 0.1.0

There is already 0.2.1 on GitHub, can you please update?


> Summary: Tool/library for building module streams locally.

A summary shouldn't end with a period.


> Source0: https://github.com/mcurlej/module-build/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

You can do

    Source0: %{URL}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

to make the line shorter.


> %description
> A library and a cli tool for building module streams. 

Can you please write 2-3 sentences about the package?


> %check
> %pytest

The tests are failing in Mock, can you please take a look?


> Tue Feb 01 2022 Martin Čurlej <mcurlej> - 0.1.0-1

It may be a good idea to go without the special characters

Comment 3 Package Review 2023-12-15 00:45:24 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 4 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-12-17 17:08:45 UTC
I am interested in reviewing this ticket but there is no response from the contributor.

Comment 5 Package Review 2024-12-17 00:45:30 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 6 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2024-12-19 08:47:08 UTC
I think we can close this. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireModularity
and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWM-4300 mean any tools related to
modularity are unlikely to be useful.