Bug 2045988
Summary: | Please package python3-mock into EPEL9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup> |
Component: | python-mock | Assignee: | Orphan Owner <extras-orphan> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel9 | CC: | extras-orphan, fschwarz, mhroncok, python-sig, TicoTimo |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-01-26 08:26:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2045987 |
Description
Pavel Raiskup
2022-01-26 06:42:55 UTC
I think python-responses also works without mock, using "unittest.mock" then. So maybe we don't need this package? > I think python-responses also works without mock, using "unittest.mock" then. So maybe we don't need this package?
Perhaps? I did not try so far. Note there's also python-humanize that currently depends on python-mock.
python-mock was added to epel9 and later retired. Let's save ourselves some cycles and not do it again? I can send a PR to python-humanize and python-responses. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-humanize/pull-request/5 (The package is seriously outdated.) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2029156 *** > python-mock was added to epel9 and later retired. Let's save ourselves some cycles and not do it again? ACK > I can send a PR to python-humanize and python-responses. Thanks! |