Bug 2047442
Summary: | Please branch and build rocksdb in epel8 and epel9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Davide Cavalca <davide> |
Component: | rocksdb | Assignee: | Davide Cavalca <davide> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | hegjon, mmuzila |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | rocksdb-6.26.1-2.el8 rocksdb-6.26.1-2.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-02-17 03:16:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2047441 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1914423 |
Description
Davide Cavalca
2022-01-27 20:48:48 UTC
rocksdb builds out of the box on epel8 from a local test. On epel9 it needs gflags-devel, which I've requested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047441 EPEL Packaging SIG added as co-maintainer Re-open, since the branches have not been made epel8: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41819 epel9: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41820 I would like that someone else is doing the maintenance for epel, do you mind changing the assignee Davide Cavalca? Sure, happy to take this. Also feel free to set the bugzilla assignee for EPEL on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocksdb to @epel-packagers-sig if you'd like. Thanks! I'm not able to push to the epel8 and epel9 branches: $ git push Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 remote: Fall-through deny remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/epel9' for user 'dcavalca' remote: All changes have been rejected To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocksdb ! [remote rejected] epel9 -> epel9 (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocksdb' Could you please check the permissions again? I see epel-packagers-sig is listed as collaborator, but please make sure it has epel* in the branch access list. Thanks! Thanks. I added you as admin, plus specified epel* as branch for epel-packagers-sig. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ef2708d9e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ef2708d9e FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ada84f72 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ada84f72 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ef2708d9e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ef2708d9e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ada84f72 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ada84f72 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ef2708d9e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-03ada84f72 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |