Bug 2052110

Summary:	Please branch and build kdsoap in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Troy Dawson <tdawson>
Component:	kdsoap	Assignee:	Casper Meijn <casper>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	36	CC:	casper
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	kdsoap-2.0.0-2.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-02-17 03:34:26 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Troy Dawson 2022-02-08 18:08:29 UTC

Please branch and build kdsoap in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain kdsoap in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package. (FES: tdawson)
Since this is a kde package, it would also be good to set kde-sig as a co-maintainer as well.
Please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kdsoap/adduser

Comment 1 Troy Dawson 2022-02-08 18:10:18 UTC

Currently kdsoap BuildRequires /usr/bin/qhelpgenerator, which is from qt-devel.  That is qt4 based.
That requirement can be dropped in favor of qt5-qhelpgenerator and the package still builds fine in both rawhide and epel9.

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ BuildRequires:  gcc-c++
 BuildRequires:  cmake
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(Qt5Core)
 BuildRequires:  dos2unix
-BuildRequires:  /usr/bin/qhelpgenerator
+BuildRequires:  qt5-qhelpgenerator
 BuildRequires:  doxygen
 
 %description

Comment 2 Casper Meijn 2022-02-08 19:52:53 UTC

Hi Troy,

I added you as collaborator. I have no experience with epel, so I suggest you take care of that branch.

For the qhelpgenerator, I suggest you open a pull request to the package repo. It seems the qt4 dependency is a mistake.

Casper

Comment 3 Fedora Program Management 2022-02-08 20:04:14 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 20:04:39 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 5 Troy Dawson 2022-02-08 20:42:48 UTC

I am totally fine taking care of the epel branch.  Thank You.

Here is the pull request.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kdsoap/pull-request/5

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-02-09 14:43:08 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-295114bf50 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-295114bf50

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-02-10 01:55:18 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-295114bf50 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-295114bf50

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-02-17 03:34:26 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-295114bf50 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.