Bug 205221
| Summary: | File conflicts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
| Component: | libpfm | Assignee: | William Cohen <wcohen> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jlaska, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 3.2-0.060621.10 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-09-19 20:02:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 192658 | ||
You should only install one libpfm on the machine. You wouldn't be using a 32-bit libpfm on a 64-bit machine. The 64bit version of the software should be installing the libraries in the /usr/lib64 to be consistent with other packages. Both are installed for development purposes. Took a closer look at what is going on with libpfm. libpfm has a file config.mk included into the Makefile. The config.mk has the following line that hardcodes the directory: PFMLIBDIR=$(TOPDIR)/lib Have workaround in the libpfm.spec for 3.2-0.060621.10 to move the libraries into the correct place. *** Bug 222707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
Description of problem: file /usr/lib/libpfm.a from install of libpfm-devel-3.2-0.060621.8.1 conflicts with file from package libpfm-devel-3.2-0.060621.8.1 Shouldn't that be somewhere else on x86-64?