Bug 205247

Summary: New postfix packages create problems with Alias
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Morey Roof <mroof>
Component: postfixAssignee: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.4CC: pknirsch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-08 09:10:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Morey Roof 2006-09-05 15:44:12 UTC
When we updated our redhat Enterprise Linux system to the new postfix 2.2.10-1
from 2.1.5-4.2 our alias that pipe output to programs created a problem.  These
aliases look like this:

pager:          |"/home/pager/send_page.pl"
verizon:        |"/home/pager/send_page_verizon.pl"
sprintpcs:      |"/home/pager/send_page_sprintpcs.pl"
tmobile:        |"/home/pager/send_page_tmobile.pl"

The system was no longer able to process mail and in the /var/log/maillog these
messages were repeated:

Sep  2 05:29:17 services postfix/master[3870]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
Sep  2 05:30:18 services postfix/master[3870]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
Sep  2 05:31:19 services postfix/master[3870]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling

Rerunning newaliases or postaliases does not fix problem and the only thing we
could do to correct the problem was to move back to the older package.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2008-10-31 16:49:45 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 3 Miroslav Lichvar 2010-03-08 09:10:55 UTC
We are sorry for not addressing this issue in RHEL-4. As postfix is not scheduled for an update in RHEL-4.9, I'm closing this bug as WONTFIX. If you are still experiencing this issue with RHEL-5, please reopen it against RHEL-5.