Bug 205670
Summary: | Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christian Iseli <Christian.Iseli> |
Component: | monkey-bubble | Assignee: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-10 05:20:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Christian Iseli
2006-09-07 22:51:39 UTC
Hmm, Does that mean that all the involved package shoud now add a: "Requires: scrollkeeper" ? Because currently all of my scrollkeeper using packages only contain: Requires(pre): GConf2 Requires(post): GConf2 scrollkeeper Requires(preun): GConf2 Requires(postun): scrollkeeper (In reply to comment #1) > Does that mean that all the involved package shoud now add a: > "Requires: scrollkeeper" ? Not sure. Let's see if a consensus emerges on f-e-l... OK, fixed now by Requiring scrollkeeper (which was effectivly already happening because of the postun script Require. |