Bug 2058680
| Summary: | Add AArch64 ipxe roms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore> | |
| Component: | ipxe | Assignee: | Fedora Virtualization Maintainers <virt-maint> | |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | berrange, crobinso, kraxel, pbonzini, pbrobinson, pwhalen, virt-maint, yselkowi | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 2059349 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-04-04 18:04:00 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 245418 | |||
|
Description
Dennis Gilmore
2022-02-25 15:30:42 UTC
> them. We have some use cases in OpenShift that will need iPXE for UEFI, use
> in QEMU and on baremetal should both work.
What are the usecases for iPXE?
Bare metal IPI is designed around ipxe. (In reply to Dennis Gilmore from comment #3) > Bare metal IPI is designed around ipxe. --verbose please. What exactly do you need? ipxe-snponly.efi I guess? Why don't you just use standard UEFI network boot? This is discussed at length in bug 2059350, through which a backport was accepted into 8.6. Can we please proceed with the Fedora PR? Merged and built now. But fedora still has ipxe.efi. Any objections to ripping it out until there's a defined need? From the bug it sounds like all you need is snponly |