Bug 2059156

Summary:	Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel8 and epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Markus Muckhoff <markus.muckhoff>
Component:	gtksourceview3	Assignee:	Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	gnome-sig, icq, mclasen, raveit65.sun, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	gtksourceview3-3.24.11-7.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-07-19 02:06:46 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2100267, 1914423

Description Markus Muckhoff 2022-02-28 10:41:52 UTC

As commented in bug ticket #2041567 gtksourceview3 is needed to build xpad in epel9/centos-9-stream (and I think this might be true for building xpad in epel8 as well).

Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel8.

Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9.

Comment 1 Markus Muckhoff 2022-03-07 09:29:51 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel8 and epel9?

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2022-06-21 20:54:35 UTC

Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain gtksourceview3 in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtksourceview3/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2022-06-26 10:48:19 UTC

Reverted unintended part of the change (no longer blocks bug #2101178 is correct, but component shall still be gtksourceview3).

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2022-06-26 22:03:24 UTC

Note: RHEL 8 already ships gtksourceview3 (via AppStream) and gtksourceview3-devel (via CRB/PowerTools), but both are missing in EPEL 9.

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2022-06-30 22:21:54 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2022-07-05 21:00:41 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 7 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2022-07-09 17:01:52 UTC

Hi Matthias,
can you please build gtksourceview3 for epel9. We need that for for building mate-applets.

Comment 8 Robert Scheck 2022-07-12 20:01:15 UTC

I've now filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10884 according to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/#epel_packagers_sig_members, because there was no response by the maintainer after at least three weeks and at least three attempts (even when counting just my own activity).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-07-13 21:27:23 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-07-14 02:04:02 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-07-19 02:06:46 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.