Bug 2059156 - Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel8 and epel9
Summary: Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel8 and epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gtksourceview3
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthias Clasen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: EPEL9MATE EPELPackagersSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-02-28 10:41 UTC by Markus Muckhoff
Modified: 2022-07-19 02:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gtksourceview3-3.24.11-7.el9
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-07-19 02:06:46 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Markus Muckhoff 2022-02-28 10:41:52 UTC
As commented in bug ticket #2041567 gtksourceview3 is needed to build xpad in epel9/centos-9-stream (and I think this might be true for building xpad in epel8 as well).

Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel8.

Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9.

Comment 1 Markus Muckhoff 2022-03-07 09:29:51 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel8 and epel9?

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2022-06-21 20:54:35 UTC
Please branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain gtksourceview3 in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtksourceview3/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2022-06-26 10:48:19 UTC
Reverted unintended part of the change (no longer blocks bug #2101178 is correct, but component shall still be gtksourceview3).

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2022-06-26 22:03:24 UTC
Note: RHEL 8 already ships gtksourceview3 (via AppStream) and gtksourceview3-devel (via CRB/PowerTools), but both are missing in EPEL 9.

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2022-06-30 22:21:54 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2022-07-05 21:00:41 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build gtksourceview3 in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 7 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2022-07-09 17:01:52 UTC
Hi Matthias,
can you please build gtksourceview3 for epel9. We need that for for building mate-applets.

Comment 8 Robert Scheck 2022-07-12 20:01:15 UTC
I've now filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10884 according to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/#epel_packagers_sig_members, because there was no response by the maintainer after at least three weeks and at least three attempts (even when counting just my own activity).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-07-13 21:27:23 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-07-14 02:04:02 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-07-19 02:06:46 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e213d06798 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.