Bug 205932
Summary: | hardcoded net-scripts dependency | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Denis Ovsienko <denis> |
Component: | dhcp | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-29 19:42:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 195365 |
Description
Denis Ovsienko
2006-09-10 14:29:50 UTC
Well, 195353 is CLOSED WONTFIX, so I'm not going to modify the dhclient-script. This one is CLOSED WONTFIX. I can understand wanting a different network configuration subsystem, but it becomes really difficult to abstract those layers and at some point, you do need some sort of glue between all of the parts the distribution provides and the parts you want to replace. If I was to conditionalize the sourcing of various initscripts files, how would I handle the instances where I want to run one of the functions provided by those files? Is your netscripts replacement going to provide functions by the same name? If so, great, but what about other replacements? This is a reasonable project, but I think the approach is wrong. Closing this bug since 195353 is closed. |