Bug 2061453

Summary:	Add python-dotenv for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Mohamed Akram <mohd.akram>
Component:	python-dotenv	Assignee:	Major Hayden 🤠 <mhayden>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	ksurma, mhayden, mhroncok, python-sig
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-dotenv-0.19.2-3.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-08 04:09:42 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2061460
Bug Blocks:	2060046, 2077853

Description Mohamed Akram 2022-03-07 15:41:58 UTC

Description of problem:

This package is required by podman-compose.

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2022-03-07 18:14:19 UTC

I am not interested in maintaining this package in EPEL 9.

Comment 2 Mohamed Akram 2022-03-22 14:07:46 UTC

@ksurma Are you able to do this? There is a spec file here - https://git.centos.org/rpms/python-dotenv/blob/c9s-sig-cloud-openstack-xena/f/SPECS/python-dotenv.spec - without the ipython dependency (which currently requires too many missing packages).

Comment 3 Karolina Surma 2022-03-22 15:53:20 UTC

I'm sorry, I'm also not interested in maintaining this package in EPEL 9.

Comment 4 Major Hayden 🤠 2022-04-27 19:21:10 UTC

Miro - I'd be glad to maintain this one in EPEL 9 since dotenv is getting plenty of use by Microsoft folks in the azure-cli and python SDKs. It would help me get BZ 2077853 done. 😉

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2022-04-27 19:24:30 UTC

Go ahead, you should have the rights now.

If you need to push something to rawhide, I would prefer (somebody) to review it in a pull request first thou.

Comment 6 Major Hayden 🤠 2022-04-28 11:40:26 UTC

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5)
> Go ahead, you should have the rights now.

Thank you!

> If you need to push something to rawhide, I would prefer (somebody) to
> review it in a pull request first thou.

That works for me!

Comment 7 Major Hayden 🤠 2022-04-28 11:43:04 UTC

Branch requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43977

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-04-28 15:22:27 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5eaefb8172 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5eaefb8172

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-04-29 08:39:34 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5eaefb8172 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5eaefb8172

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-05-08 04:09:42 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5eaefb8172 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.