Bug 2061761

Summary: Unable to install tito on EPEL9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik>
Component: titoAssignee: Devan Goodwin <dgoodwin>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: dgoodwin, jeff, jkadlcik, lee.jnk, mmatsuya, ptoscano
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-04-08 15:30:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2052617, 2061763, 2061765, 2061768, 2061772    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jakub Kadlčík 2022-03-08 14:06:59 UTC 
Description of problem:
There are missing runtime dependencies for tito on EPEL9


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tito-0.6.20-1.el9.noarch


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install tito


Actual results:
Error: 
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides /usr/bin/cheetah needed by tito-0.6.20-1.el9.noarch
  - nothing provides fedpkg needed by tito-0.6.20-1.el9.noarch
  - nothing provides fedora-packager needed by tito-0.6.20-1.el9.noarch
  - nothing provides python3-blessed needed by tito-0.6.20-1.el9.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)



Expected results:
Tito is expected to work on EPEL9


Additional info:
None
Comment 1 jeff 2023-01-13 13:48:46 UTC 
*** Bug 2160722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Pino Toscano 2023-04-08 07:22:29 UTC 
Jakub: it looks like fedora-packager just hit EPEL 9, and it seems that I can install tito on EPEL 9 now!

If you want to confirm that too, I think it should be enough to consider this done :)
Comment 3 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-04-08 15:30:36 UTC 
You are right Pino, 
works for me :-)

Thank you.