Bug 206422

Summary: [hi_IN, mr_IN] Some GSUB and shapes should be more perfect - Priority - B
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Satyabrata Maitra <smaitra>
Component: lohit-fontsAssignee: Satish Mohan <smohan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 11CC: aalam, i18n-bugs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-06 07:15:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch
none
Verified Image none

Description Satyabrata Maitra 2006-09-14 11:03:01 UTC 
Description of problem: Some GSUB char is now appearing with the shape which can
be more accurately implemented. The current shape is not wrong, but still as per
the LM's concent, It should show a slight different shape.

GSUB List :

U+0915 U+094D U+0915
U+0915 U+094D U+0932
U+0915 U+094D U+0935
U+091A U+094D U+091A
U+091C U+094D U+091C
U+092A U+094D U+0932
U+092B U+094D U+0932
U+091B U+094D U+0935
U+0926 U+094D U+0917
U+0926 U+094D U+0928
U+0926 U+094D U+0936

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonts-indic-2.0.1-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gedit
2. Activate SCIM with CTRL+SPACE.
3. Select RAWCODE from the scim-table in Others
4. Type the unicode sequentially as given but without 'U' and '+'.
5. Observe the result.


Actual results:
Shapes are slightly different from actual shape.

Expected results:
Shape should be excatly as actual shape

Additional info:
Comment 1 Satyabrata Maitra 2006-09-14 11:27:28 UTC 
Component Version tested : fonts-hindi-2.0.1-1
Comment 3 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-28 14:50:42 UTC 
I don't think following combinations have any problems.
They were not even reported by hi_IN LM, Rajesh.

1. U+091B U+094D U+0935
2. U+0926 U+094D U+0936(there is no combination like this at all)
Comment 4 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-28 15:38:46 UTC 
Created attachment 137318 [details]
Patch
Comment 5 Leon Ho 2006-09-29 06:55:48 UTC 
Built in 2.0.5-1
Comment 6 A S Alam 2007-04-27 13:12:26 UTC 
Created attachment 153620 [details]
Verified Image
Comment 7 A S Alam 2007-04-27 13:15:51 UTC 
out 11 combination mention in bug, 1 is not exist (as mention in comment 3), but
other last 2 combinations are working, Can you please confirm whether those are
required in language or not?
fonts-hindi-2.1.5-1.fc7
Comment 8 Rahul Bhalerao 2008-01-17 13:34:11 UTC 
The last two combinations are not really required. Thus the bug is fixed, please
close it.
Comment 9 Jon Stanley 2008-04-23 20:29:29 UTC 
Adding FutureFeature keyword to RFE's.
Comment 10 Tony Fu 2008-09-10 03:16:58 UTC 
requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)
Comment 11 A S Alam 2009-06-12 07:37:23 UTC 
Image with Comment #6 is still true with following version in Fedora Rawhide/11:
lohit-hindi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11

it is verified as per comment #8 (Developer comment).

Change to Fedora 11 to follow.