Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Some GSUB char is now appearing with the shape which can be more accurately implemented. The current shape is not wrong, but still as per the LM's concent, It should show a slight different shape. GSUB List : U+0915 U+094D U+0915 U+0915 U+094D U+0932 U+0915 U+094D U+0935 U+091A U+094D U+091A U+091C U+094D U+091C U+092A U+094D U+0932 U+092B U+094D U+0932 U+091B U+094D U+0935 U+0926 U+094D U+0917 U+0926 U+094D U+0928 U+0926 U+094D U+0936 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-indic-2.0.1-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit 2. Activate SCIM with CTRL+SPACE. 3. Select RAWCODE from the scim-table in Others 4. Type the unicode sequentially as given but without 'U' and '+'. 5. Observe the result. Actual results: Shapes are slightly different from actual shape. Expected results: Shape should be excatly as actual shape Additional info:
Component Version tested : fonts-hindi-2.0.1-1
I don't think following combinations have any problems. They were not even reported by hi_IN LM, Rajesh. 1. U+091B U+094D U+0935 2. U+0926 U+094D U+0936(there is no combination like this at all)
Created attachment 137318 [details] Patch
Built in 2.0.5-1
Created attachment 153620 [details] Verified Image
out 11 combination mention in bug, 1 is not exist (as mention in comment 3), but other last 2 combinations are working, Can you please confirm whether those are required in language or not? fonts-hindi-2.1.5-1.fc7
The last two combinations are not really required. Thus the bug is fixed, please close it.
Adding FutureFeature keyword to RFE's.
requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)
Image with Comment #6 is still true with following version in Fedora Rawhide/11: lohit-hindi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11 it is verified as per comment #8 (Developer comment). Change to Fedora 11 to follow.