Bug 206492

Summary:	Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Paul Wouters <paul>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Jochen Schmitt <jochen>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	tomspur
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-09-16 06:24:21 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Paul Wouters 2006-09-14 18:04:42 UTC

Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-1.src.rpm
Description: 
ssss is an implementation of Shamir's secret sharing scheme.  ssss does
both: the generation of shares for a known secret and the reconstruction
of a secret using user provided shares.

Comment 1 Jochen Schmitt 2006-09-14 18:13:11 UTC

Good:
+ rpmlint don't complaints source rpm.

Bad:
- Local build complaints:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fasynchronous-unwind-tables/-O2"
Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.11940 (%build)

Comment 2 Paul Wouters 2006-09-15 02:28:39 UTC

Thanks for checking the package. It was an odd error on my end. I used:

gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags} -lgmp -o ssss-split ssss.c

Of course, I should have used either $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags}

Oddly enough, it built fine on my x86_64 with those broken flags. But I fixed it
now:

Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-2.src.rpm

Comment 3 Paul Wouters 2006-09-16 06:24:21 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206494 ***

Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2006-12-02 02:24:18 UTC

Marking as bug #201449

Comment 5 Paul Wouters 2007-01-22 22:01:42 UTC

actually not, it was approved in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494

Comment 6 Thomas Spura 2010-11-02 16:46:21 UTC

ssss is in fedora, so don't block FE-DEADREVIEW