Bug 206492 - Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme
Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 206494
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jochen Schmitt
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-09-14 18:04 UTC by Paul Wouters
Modified: 2010-11-02 16:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-09-16 06:24:21 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paul Wouters 2006-09-14 18:04:42 UTC
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-1.src.rpm
ssss is an implementation of Shamir's secret sharing scheme.  ssss does
both: the generation of shares for a known secret and the reconstruction
of a secret using user provided shares.

Comment 1 Jochen Schmitt 2006-09-14 18:13:11 UTC
+ rpmlint don't complaints source rpm.

- Local build complaints:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fasynchronous-unwind-tables/-O2"
Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.11940 (%build)

Comment 2 Paul Wouters 2006-09-15 02:28:39 UTC
Thanks for checking the package. It was an odd error on my end. I used:

gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags} -lgmp -o ssss-split ssss.c

Of course, I should have used either $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags}

Oddly enough, it built fine on my x86_64 with those broken flags. But I fixed it

Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-2.src.rpm

Comment 3 Paul Wouters 2006-09-16 06:24:21 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206494 ***

Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2006-12-02 02:24:18 UTC
Marking as bug #201449

Comment 5 Paul Wouters 2007-01-22 22:01:42 UTC
actually not, it was approved in

Comment 6 Thomas Spura 2010-11-02 16:46:21 UTC
ssss is in fedora, so don't block FE-DEADREVIEW

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.