Bug 206575

Summary: Miss-placed file /usr/include/OpenNL/LICENSE.OPENNL
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203>
Component: CGALAssignee: Laurent Rineau <laurent.rineau__fedora>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: extras-qa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-15 13:15:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ralf Corsepius 2006-09-15 03:37:58 UTC
Description of problem:
CGAL-devel ships /usr/include/OpenNL/LICENSE.OPENNL

This file should not be present there. 
You could consider to move it to /usr/share/doc/CGAL-devel*/

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
CGAL-devel-3.2.1-17.fc5

Comment 1 Laurent Rineau 2006-09-15 13:15:51 UTC
Thank you Ralf. Fixed in CGAL-3.2.1-18. Jobs 17475 for CGAL-3_2_1-18_fc5 and 
17476 for CGAL-3_2_1-18_fc6.

Actually, the status of /usr/include/OpenNL/ itself is unsure. I am in touch 
with the upstream developper of OpenNL since this morning. I do not know if 
OpenNL should be packaged separately. Blender (packaged in FE) ships a version 
of OpenNL in its tarball. But the binary packages of blender do not expose any 
blender files.

Comment 2 Laurent Rineau 2006-09-15 13:17:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> But the binary packages of blender do not expose any 
> blender files.

I meant "the binary package of blender do not expose any OpenNL files".