Bug 206575
Summary: | Miss-placed file /usr/include/OpenNL/LICENSE.OPENNL | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ralf Corsepius <rc040203> |
Component: | CGAL | Assignee: | Laurent Rineau <laurent.rineau__fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-15 13:15:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ralf Corsepius
2006-09-15 03:37:58 UTC
Thank you Ralf. Fixed in CGAL-3.2.1-18. Jobs 17475 for CGAL-3_2_1-18_fc5 and 17476 for CGAL-3_2_1-18_fc6. Actually, the status of /usr/include/OpenNL/ itself is unsure. I am in touch with the upstream developper of OpenNL since this morning. I do not know if OpenNL should be packaged separately. Blender (packaged in FE) ships a version of OpenNL in its tarball. But the binary packages of blender do not expose any blender files. (In reply to comment #1) > But the binary packages of blender do not expose any > blender files. I meant "the binary package of blender do not expose any OpenNL files". |