Bug 2065835

Summary: Please branch and build scotch in epel 9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Mark E. Fuller <mark.e.fuller>
Component: scotchAssignee: Sandro Mani <manisandro>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: dakingun, manisandro, mark.olesen, orion, panos.asproulis, sergio, trix, trpost
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-04-01 19:45:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2066215    

Description Mark E. Fuller 2022-03-18 20:16:22 UTC
Please branch and build scotch in epel8 and epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain scotch in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS fuller);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/scotch/adduser

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2022-06-01 03:43:54 UTC
Ping - Sandro can you build this and/or add fuller?  Thank you.

Seems to build fine - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=87759223

Comment 2 Sergio Basto 2022-12-21 17:39:25 UTC
(In reply to Mark E. Fuller from comment #0)
> Please branch and build scotch in epel8 and epel9.
> 
> If you do not wish to maintain scotch in epel9,
> or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
> I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS fuller);
> please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/scotch/adduser

user fuller (Mark E. Fuller ) is collaborator of this  package , so you can build it on epel 8 and 9 I guess

Comment 3 Sergio Basto 2022-12-21 17:45:25 UTC
Attention , 

after review scotch was build for centos8 stream but not centos 9 stream 

https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/scotch/-/tree/c8s

https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/scotch/-/commit/510c5b25db89c07f1ee0c48da615b0e1e8456425

Comment 4 mark.olesen 2022-12-21 18:50:39 UTC
I just got scuppered by this as well, when trying to support binary packages for the upcoming OpenFOAM-v2212 release (www.openfoam.com). I had been relying on having some provider of scotch/pt-scotch (or even metis if need be). Without these graph methods, no domain decomposition and thus no parallel computing. For some industrial users of OpenFOAM, there is a definite preference to using as many RedHat system packages as possible.

Comment 5 Orion Poplawski 2022-12-22 03:01:54 UTC
Well, it does build fine in epel9 - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95607362

Fuller - are you still interested in this?  I could be added to the package as well.

Comment 6 Sergio Basto 2022-12-22 10:55:20 UTC
*** Bug 2102728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Sergio Basto 2022-12-22 10:56:25 UTC
*** Bug 2124374 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Mark E. Fuller 2022-12-27 20:09:15 UTC
Yes, Orion, thank you - it's one of a few dependencies I still need to build Cantera for EPEL 9

Comment 9 Antonio T. sagitter 2022-12-31 16:18:00 UTC
Sandro, could you build Scotch for EPEL9 please?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95697262

Comment 10 Sandro Mani 2022-12-31 16:24:25 UTC
I've requested the branch. I'd build version 7.0.2, which I'd also like to land in rawhide. How is it looking with the effort you started in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/?

Comment 11 Antonio T. sagitter 2022-12-31 16:58:58 UTC
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #10)
> I've requested the branch. I'd build version 7.0.2, which I'd also like to
> land in rawhide. How is it looking with the effort you started in
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/?

bout++ is not ready for PETSc-3.18
Wait for scotch-7 please, i dont know if PETSc-3.17 is compatible with Scotch-7

Comment 12 Antonio T. sagitter 2022-12-31 17:05:50 UTC
I'm testing scotch+hypre+superlu_dist+sundials+hdf5 on a Copr-epel9 project

Comment 13 Tom Rix 2022-12-31 18:47:59 UTC
Is there a dev branch of the specfile for the 7.0.2 build ?

Comment 14 Antonio T. sagitter 2022-12-31 19:59:43 UTC
(In reply to Tom Rix from comment #13)
> Is there a dev branch of the specfile for the 7.0.2 build ?

There is a Copr build of the 7.0.1
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/5033774/

Comment 15 Sandro Mani 2023-01-01 10:30:52 UTC
There is a scratch build of 7.0.2 here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95701582

Comment 16 Antonio T. sagitter 2023-01-01 20:00:38 UTC
EPEL9 builds are complete.
If you agree i can start with a side-tag build of Scotch

Comment 17 Sandro Mani 2023-01-01 21:56:21 UTC
Yes sure!

Comment 19 mark.olesen 2023-01-09 12:59:09 UTC
Just as a general heads up, we'd seen some slightly odd behaviour with scotch-7.0.1 (see https://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/issues/2666), don't know how widely reproducible it is, or if it also shows in scotch-7.0.2

Comment 20 Sergio Basto 2023-04-01 19:45:01 UTC
(In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #18)
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4ae0a52f22

was pushed to stable