Bug 206597

Summary: [or_IN]Glyph for va-phala(U0B4D+U0B35) needs modification
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rahul Bhalerao <b.rahul.pm>
Component: fonts-indicAssignee: Rahul Bhalerao <b.rahul.pm>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: eng-i18n-bugs, llch, mattdm, yshao
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-14 10:25:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 206581    
Description Flags
Image of wrong and right combination for va-phala
Verified Image none

Description Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-15 06:59:23 UTC
Description of problem:
The combinations of following kind:

   Consonant + U0B4D + U0B35

the below base form created is currently same as that for (U0B4D+U0B35).
The va-phala(U0B4D+U0B35) should contain a small dot inside as shown in the

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gedit
2. Enable SCIM
3. Enter the following rawcode:
    U0B15 + U0B4D + U0B35
Actual results:
 The glyph of current output, in the attached image.

Expected results:
 The image of requiered output with small dot, in sttached image.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-15 06:59:23 UTC
Created attachment 136334 [details]
Image of wrong and right combination for va-phala

Comment 2 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-18 07:13:17 UTC
Created attachment 136508 [details]

A dot added in the glyph of (0x0b4d+0x0b35).

Comment 3 Matthew Miller 2007-04-06 16:01:56 UTC
Fedora Core 5 and Fedora Core 6 are, as we're sure you've noticed, no longer
test releases. We're cleaning up the bug database and making sure important bug
reports filed against these test releases don't get lost. It would be helpful if
you could test this issue with a released version of Fedora or with the latest
development / test release. Thanks for your help and for your patience.

[This is a bulk message for all open FC5/FC6 test release bugs. I'm adding
myself to the CC list for each bug, so I'll see any comments you make after this
and do my best to make sure every issue gets proper attention.]

Comment 4 Rahul Bhalerao 2007-04-16 10:55:16 UTC
Fixed in FC6.

Comment 5 A S Alam 2007-09-14 10:24:12 UTC
Created attachment 195681 [details]
Verified Image

Comment 6 A S Alam 2007-09-14 10:25:11 UTC
Bug is fixed, tested with following RPM: