Bug 2077790

Summary:	Branch and build freeimage for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Component:	freeimage	Assignee:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	bruno, carl, davdunc, davide, dbrandon.johnson, hobbes1069, i, john, manisandro, michel, panos.asproulis, pasik, rakesh.pandit
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	freeimage-3.19.0-0.11.svn1889.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-12-04 00:43:11 UTC	Type:	Task
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2108919
Bug Blocks:	1914423

Description Neal Gompa 2022-04-22 09:16:45 UTC

Please branch and build freeimage in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain freeimage in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freeimage/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-19 18:30:58 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build freeimage in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 2 Richard Shaw 2022-07-20 01:01:39 UTC

You're welcome to take it over. Many of the EPEL 8 packages I tried to maintain was for running MythTV on EPEL but Fedora has been super stable for years even across upgrades so my needs have changed.

I tried assigning the EPEL packager SIG as the EPEL "maintainer" for BZ on another package but it wasn't accepted.

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-20 02:49:48 UTC

Thanks! Branch requested:

$ fedpkg request-branch epel9
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45889

It also looks like we're missing a dependency, so I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108919 for that.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-11-25 18:44:30 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-11-26 00:24:50 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-04 00:43:11 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Debarshi Ray 2023-10-19 13:52:23 UTC

*** Bug 2091168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***