Bug 2077790 - Branch and build freeimage for EPEL 9
Summary: Branch and build freeimage for EPEL 9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: freeimage
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Davide Cavalca
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2091168 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 2108919
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-04-22 09:16 UTC by Neal Gompa
Modified: 2023-10-19 13:52 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: freeimage-3.19.0-0.11.svn1889.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-04 00:43:11 UTC
Type: Task
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Gompa 2022-04-22 09:16:45 UTC
Please branch and build freeimage in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain freeimage in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freeimage/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-19 18:30:58 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build freeimage in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 2 Richard Shaw 2022-07-20 01:01:39 UTC
You're welcome to take it over. Many of the EPEL 8 packages I tried to maintain was for running MythTV on EPEL but Fedora has been super stable for years even across upgrades so my needs have changed.

I tried assigning the EPEL packager SIG as the EPEL "maintainer" for BZ on another package but it wasn't accepted.

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-20 02:49:48 UTC
Thanks! Branch requested:

$ fedpkg request-branch epel9
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45889

It also looks like we're missing a dependency, so I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108919 for that.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-11-25 18:44:30 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-11-26 00:24:50 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-04 00:43:11 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Debarshi Ray 2023-10-19 13:52:23 UTC
*** Bug 2091168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.