Bug 2084587

we have Supplements: (hunspell and langpacks-pt) so indeed, presumably (hunspell and langpacks-pt and langpacks-pt_BR) would fix this

FEDORA-2022-a3e1a84140 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a3e1a84140

FEDORA-2022-a3e1a84140 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

FEDORA-2022-12359bdd18 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-12359bdd18

I really wanted to have some difference between langpacks-pt and langpacks-pt_BR
I am looking for some good trusted source that says langpacks-pt_BR should not include hunspell-pt

It just happens to be that hunspell-pt.spec outputs one rpm with all pt_* in it. We could change hunspell-pt.spec to output two rpms, a specific pt_BR one and then the other pt one for the rest of the variants and then langpacks-pt_BR would only include hunspell-pt-BR.

(In reply to Caolan McNamara from comment #6)
> It just happens to be that hunspell-pt.spec outputs one rpm with all pt_* in
> it. We could change hunspell-pt.spec to output two rpms, a specific pt_BR
> one and then the other pt one for the rest of the variants and then
> langpacks-pt_BR would only include hunspell-pt-BR.

Just as a tip though, you might want to hold off pushing the separate rpm approach to stable for a bit due to bug 2085107 (either the backport or, of course, Gnome Software 42.2 release).

Due to a bug in how Gnome Software automatically installs langpacks, pt_BR Workstation/Silverblue systems where the user lets gnome-software do that for them might only have langpacks-pt instead of langpacks-pt_BR, so if you split a separate "hunspell-pt_BR" those systems might suddenly be without spelling dictionaries.

FEDORA-2022-12359bdd18 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-12359bdd18`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-12359bdd18

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Not fixed yet.

The line `Supplements: (hunspell and langpacks-pt and langpacks-pt_BR)` will apparently make hunspell be grabbed as weak dep only if `hunspell`, `langpacks-pt` and langpacks-pt_BR` are all present at the same time.
It ideally should work if only `hunspell` and `langpacks-pt` or if only `hunspell` and `hunspell-pt_BR` are present (i.e. only one of the langpacks portuguese packages is needed).

I believe it should be something like this instead:

```
Supplements: (hunspell and (langpacks-pt or langpacks-pt_BR))
```

(In reply to Mateus Rodrigues Costa from comment #9)

> It ideally should work if only `hunspell` and `langpacks-pt` or if only
> `hunspell` and `hunspell-pt_BR` are present (i.e. only one of the langpacks
> portuguese packages is needed).
> 

Sorry, small correction, I actually meant "if only `hunspell` and `langpacks-pt` or if only `hunspell` and `langpacks-pt_BR` are present" in this section.

FEDORA-2022-8c8ee157e6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8c8ee157e6

FEDORA-2022-8c8ee157e6 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

I request to split this package into hunspell-pt and hunspell-pt_BR for now. When supporting package and glibc locale is available we can think about pt_AO langpack creation.

I'll have another go at fixing the current Supplements line and do the split idea later.

FEDORA-2022-b7e639ac83 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b7e639ac83

(In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #13)
> When supporting package and glibc locale is available we can think about
> pt_AO langpack creation.

AFAIK there's no significant difference between pt_PT and pt_AO in most things, so it should be okay to keep both together with the Angolan variation of stuff being a symlink to the one from Portugal.

You would have to ask to someone who is familiar enough with Angolan Portuguese for more details though.

FEDORA-2022-b7e639ac83 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-b7e639ac83`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b7e639ac83

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-2022-b7e639ac83 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

FEDORA-2022-5e06d684c9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5e06d684c9

FEDORA-2022-5e06d684c9 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

FEDORA-2022-3618f33750 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3618f33750

FEDORA-2022-3618f33750 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.