Bug 2092101

Summary: Please build psutils for EPEL9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Orion Poplawski <orion>
Component: psutilsAssignee: Orion Poplawski <orion>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: opohorel, ppisar
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: psutils-2.07-1.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-01 01:29:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2158051    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Orion Poplawski 2022-05-31 19:38:28 UTC
Please build psutils for EPEL9, thanks!

Comment 1 Ondřej Pohořelský 2022-06-09 08:05:46 UTC
Paper is not built for EPEL9, which blocks this bug. At the same time, we are waiting for libpaper update to v1.2.0, which is a new dependency for psutils 2.08. Sadly, libpaper isn't built for EPEL9 either.

Comment 2 Orion Poplawski 2023-01-15 03:48:37 UTC
libpaper is part of RHEL9 and so is available at version 1.1.28.  psutils 2.07 builds fine now in EPEL9: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96144627

If you do not wish to maintain psutils in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/psutils/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: orion).

Comment 3 Ondřej Pohořelský 2023-01-17 08:21:32 UTC
I've added the epel-packagers-sig group, as I do not want to maintain the epel branches.
Do you want to be added as a co-maintainer?

Comment 4 Orion Poplawski 2023-01-22 19:05:22 UTC
epel-packagers-sig is fine.  Thanks.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2023-01-22 19:15:36 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-337aa51092 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-337aa51092

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-01-24 00:32:40 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-337aa51092 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-337aa51092

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2023-02-01 01:29:47 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-337aa51092 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.