Bug 209262
| Summary: | Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jarod Wilson <jarod> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michał Bentkowski <mr.ecik> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | alcapcom, fedora, gauret, lmacken |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-11-21 21:01:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 209259 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||
|
Description
Jarod Wilson
2006-10-04 06:21:05 UTC
Oops, this is beryl-plugins, not beryl-settings, fixing Summary... Just pushed out a 0.1.1-1 build. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-plugins-0.1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm This is a RFE: chitlesh(~)[0]$rpm -qf /usr/share/beryl/cubecaps.png beryl-plugins-0.1.1-2.fc6 from your repo. could you remplace that file with /usr/share/rhgb/main-logo.png ? It's more fedora this way :) Rather than replace that file, I've added a Source1 of fedora-cubecaps.png, which is a copy of rhgb main-logo.png, and edited the default cubecaps setting to point to the fedora-cubecaps.png. There's a -3 spec and srpm out there now. By replacing I mean, asking beryl to pickup /usr/share/rhgb/main-logo.png. A better solution might be: Add fedora-logos-6.0.6-1.fc6 as requires and patch/sed appropriately :) rpm -qf /usr/share/rhgb/main-logo.png fedora-logos-6.0.6-1.fc6 Good idea, I'll go that route instead. Latest build, using new upstream tarballs: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-plugins-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (6721bf8bd5fcbe0cabb0a67caa920fcb) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds successfully) * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well Looks pretty good for me :) Approved |