Bug 2094560
| Summary: | Please branch and build python-kitchen in epel9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Troy Dawson <tdawson> |
| Component: | python-kitchen | Assignee: | Kevin Fenzi <kevin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | infra-sig, kevin, pingou, rbean |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | python-kitchen-1.2.6-14.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-08-27 21:33:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2072308 | ||
|
Description
Troy Dawson
2022-06-07 21:31:23 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build python-kitchen in epel9? If you do not wish to maintain python-kitchen in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package on epel; Please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-kitchen/addgroup I also wouldn't mind being a co-maintainer of the package. (FES: tdawson) Please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-kitchen/adduser We should NOT branch this for epel9. We should retire the package entirely... what are you seeing that still needs it? python-kitchen was (I am pretty sure) a python2 only collection of things... python-fedora should drop the dep on it. The only place I see it needed is for python-fedora. I agree, let's have python-fedora drop the dependency on it. If that happens, I'll gladly close this. Here is a pull request to drop the python-kitchen dependency in python-fedora https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fedora/pull-request/8 Looking at the code changes that would have to happen in python-fedora, I think it would be easier to have python-kitchen in epel9 than totally re-write python-fedora. Do you mind building python-kitchen in epel9? Sorry for dragging my feet here... but I have a feeling that both python-kitchen and python-fedora aren't really needed anymore. kitchen was python3 stuff for python2. python-fedora was mostly for interacting with fas2 (which is very close to gone). But I am not sure... I need to get the attention of some of our application developers and confirm that and see if we can retire them. ;( I would love to not need python-fedora for fedpkg. I looked into it and it is only needed for testing, not for any of the code. The bug for getting fedpkg into epel9 has already commented that due to python-mock not going into epel9, that the fedpkg tests already need to be reworked. Maybe we can get both python-mock, and python-fedora out of the fedpkg tests. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061765 Any progress or thoughts on this? python-kitchen is currently the only route to getting fedpkg into epel9. Yeah, I guess lets just branch for epel9 for now and if we can get rid of it we can nuke it from there too. I'll add epel-packagers-sig. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2e9d38fc59 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2e9d38fc59 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2e9d38fc59 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2e9d38fc59 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2e9d38fc59 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |