Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionOrion Poplawski
2022-07-06 03:08:52 UTC
Description of problem:
With the exclusion of xorg-x11-font-utils it seems that nothing own /usr/share/X11/fonts:
rpm -qf /usr/share/X11/fonts
file /usr/share/X11/fonts is not owned by any package
dnf repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/X11/fonts
returns nothing
Hmm, indeed, this is a result of the splitout from xorg-x11-font-utils which previously was, effectively, always pulled in through dependencies. Is there any immediate functionality impact here though?
I'm wondering, this should probably go into filesystem.rpm.
No immediate functionality impact - though I guess you can get some permission oddness in rare cases. More of a "correctness" issue. filesystem already owns /usr/share/X11 so that seems a reasonable solution.
*** Bug 2059773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6Martin Osvald 🛹
2023-08-16 05:07:00 UTC
This bug has been scheduled for migration to Jira (https://issues.redhat.com).
Please, let me know if you face any problems once it is done (Jira login creation, etc.).
Comment 7RHEL Program Management
2023-08-16 06:43:49 UTC
Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.
Comment 8Martin Osvald 🛹
2023-08-16 11:17:24 UTC
Copy&pasting the below text from other BZ which got closed automatically after migration as it contains useful info (apparently this one got stuck at comment 7):
~~~
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue
Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.
To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to
the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to
it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer. You can also find this
issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the
"Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:
"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567
In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an
issue by sending mail to rh-issues.
~~~