Bug 2109021
Summary: | virt-v2v: Import dialog, attaching VirtIO drivers failed with Invalid ISO image path error. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Nisim Simsolo <nsimsolo> |
Component: | BLL.Virt | Assignee: | Milan Zamazal <mzamazal> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | meital avital <mavital> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 4.5.2 | CC: | bugs, michal.skrivanek, mzamazal, nsimsolo, smelamud |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.5.3 | Flags: | pm-rhel:
ovirt-4.5?
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-08-09 07:31:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Virt | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nisim Simsolo
2022-07-20 09:33:09 UTC
The validation apparently fails in ImportVmFromExternalProviderCommand.java: if (getVm().getOrigin() != OriginType.KVM && getParameters().getVirtioIsoName() != null && getActiveIsoDomainId() == null) { return failValidation(EngineMessage.ERROR_CANNOT_FIND_ISO_IMAGE_PATH); } Nisim, is it a regression or not? What's the difference to Bug 1632068? That we import a non-kvm VM this time? Is it supposed to work this way? First, just to clarify: 1. when using ISO domain it's possible to attach VirtIO drivers and import VM from VMware or Xen. 2. As for the virtio-win.iso in data domain, same issue occurs when trying to import from Xen. > Nisim, is it a regression or not? Yes, it worked before. <What's the difference to Bug 1632068? That we import a non-kvm VM this time? Is it supposed to work this way? The option to attach VirtIO drivers when importing from KVM is no longer optional (checkbox and dropbox removed) The WARN log from bug 1632068 is the same as this one, but I can't tell if it's the same issue or not. using iso domain is a reasonable workaround I'll look whether the fix is possibly trivial, otherwise we'll close the bug. Is this bug different from bug 1721455? As pointed out on GitHub, this bug is indeed the same as Bug 1721455, so closing it as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1721455 *** |