Bug 2109939

The current spec failed to build to me when trying fedora-review -b 2109939. I admit I have trouble finding what exactly is reponsible for the failure.

I think the package should Provides: python3-%{name}, as recommended by python guidelines.

I think the main issue reported in root.log:

DEBUG util.py:443:  Error: 
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(blinker) < 1.5~~ with python3dist(blinker) >= 1.4)
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(flask) < 2.2~~ with python3dist(flask) >= 1.1.1)
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 3: nothing provides requested (python3dist(wsproto) < 1.2~~ with python3dist(wsproto) >= 1)
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 4: nothing provides requested (python3dist(zstandard) < 0.19~~ with python3dist(zstandard) >= 0.11)
DEBUG util.py:445:  (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
DEBUG util.py:596:  Child return code was: 1

Please fix dependencies to build on current rawhide. It seems adjustment to newer versions is required.

python3-blinker-0:1.5-1.fc37.noarch
python3-flask-1:2.2.2-1.fc37.noarch
python3-wsproto-0:1.2.0-1.fc38.noarch
python3-zstandard-0:0.19.0-1.fc38.x86_64

Created attachment 1939023 [details]
root.log

Created attachment 1939024 [details]
build.log

Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mitmproxy/mitmproxy.spec
SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mitmproxy/mitmproxy-8.1.1-2.fc37.src.rpm

* Fri Jan 20 2023 Dominik Mierzejewski <dominik> - 8.1.1-2
- relax deps versions requirements to fix build on rawhide
- fix tests

NOTE: I can't update to 9.0.x because some dependencies are too old in Fedora rawhide, in particular pyOpenSSL 22.1 is required.

If you need help with packaging mitmproxy_wireguard (a new dependency of mitmproxy 9), let me know. I'm the upstream developer. :)

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5278069
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2109939-mitmproxy/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05278069-mitmproxy/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

It seems once again the package is no longer buildable as it is. Review failed to build it with:

Finish: rpmbuild mitmproxy-8.1.1-2.fc37.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for mitmproxy-8.1.1-2.fc37.src.rpm
ERROR: Exception(/home/pemensik/fedora/rawhide/2109939-mitmproxy/srpm/mitmproxy-8.1.1-2.fc37.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 34 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/pemensik/fedora/rawhide/2109939-mitmproxy/results
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 9f7bca7d9a74444185960059c1203d86 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.fxon_rzx:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007" --setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$  --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 40 --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/mitmproxy-8.1.1-2.fc40.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
fedora                                           67 kB/s | 8.2 kB     00:00    
Package python3-sortedcontainers-2.4.0-13.fc39.noarch is already installed.
Package glibc-langpack-en-2.38.9000-12.fc40.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pyproject-rpm-macros-1.10.0-1.fc40.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-devel-3.12.0-1.fc40.x86_64 is already installed.
Package python3-devel-3.12.0-1.fc40.x86_64 is already installed.
Package python3-setuptools-68.2.2-1.fc40.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-hypothesis-6.82.0-2.fc40.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-packaging-23.1-5.fc40.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-parver-0.4-1.fc40.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc39.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-pytest-7.4.2-1.fc40.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-pytest-asyncio-0.21.0-5.fc39.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-pytest-xdist-3.3.1-3.fc39.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-setuptools-68.2.2-1.fc40.noarch is already installed.
Package python3-wheel-1:0.40.0-4.fc39.noarch is already installed.
Error: 
 Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(asgiref) < 3.6~~ with python3dist(asgiref) >= 3.2.10)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(blinker) < 1.6~~ with python3dist(blinker) >= 1.4)
 Problem 3: nothing provides requested (python3dist(brotli) < 1.1~~ with python3dist(brotli) >= 1)
 Problem 4: nothing provides requested (python3dist(cryptography) < 38~~ with python3dist(cryptography) >= 36)
 Problem 5: nothing provides requested (python3dist(h11) < 0.14~~ with python3dist(h11) >= 0.11)
 Problem 6: nothing provides requested (python3dist(pyopenssl) < 22.1~~ with python3dist(pyopenssl) >= 21)
 Problem 7: nothing provides requested (python3dist(urwid) < 2.2~~ with python3dist(urwid) >= 2.1.1)
 Problem 8: nothing provides requested (python3dist(zstandard) < 0.20~~ with python3dist(zstandard) >= 0.11)
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

I expect another version rebase might fix it. At least python3-pyOpenSSL-0:23.2.0-1.fc40.noarch is now in rawhide. But it seems moving quite fast a breaking dependencies often.

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

I'm still interested in packaging this. I'll post a new working SRPM soon.