Bug 2111552

Summary: [4.10.z][OVNK] Conntrack Rules are removed before the service rules/flows
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Surya Seetharaman <surya>
Component: NetworkingAssignee: Surya Seetharaman <surya>
Networking sub component: ovn-kubernetes QA Contact: Anurag saxena <anusaxen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA Docs Contact:
Severity: high    
Priority: high CC: anusaxen, bbennett, mkennell
Version: 4.8   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.10.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2111548 Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-09-13 08:28:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2111548    
Bug Blocks: 2090315    

Description Surya Seetharaman 2022-07-27 13:22:13 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2111548 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2111534 +++

Description of problem:

When we fixed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053609, we ended up deleting the conntrack entries for services before the service flows and iptable rules were removed.

To be safer, removing conntrack entries should be done after the service flows and rules to ensure the entries don't get recreated.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2022-09-13 08:28:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.32 bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:6372