Bug 2116831

Summary: Please branch and build bindfs in epel9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: tasmanian
Component: bindfsAssignee: Filipe Rosset <rosset.filipe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: opensource, rosset.filipe
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: bindfs-1.17.0-1.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-09-09 12:04:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description tasmanian 2022-08-09 11:52:59 UTC
Please branch and build bindfs in epel9.

Comment 1 tasmanian 2022-08-14 12:38:27 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build bindfs in epel9?

Comment 2 Filipe Rosset 2022-08-19 01:31:20 UTC
requested epel9 branch https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/46527

Comment 3 tasmanian 2022-08-19 06:02:14 UTC
Thank you!

Comment 4 tasmanian 2022-08-19 15:02:53 UTC
@rosset.filipe 
The issue was marked as invalid as it states that you‘re not the maintainer, jfyi.
Should I describe the issue to https://pagure.io/releng/issues or is this only possible for you? As I do not have the knowledge to branch and build, I‘d like to support your work by doing at least in the paperwork for you.

Comment 5 Filipe Rosset 2022-08-30 04:03:28 UTC
(In reply to tasmanian from comment #4)
> @rosset.filipe 
> The issue was marked as invalid as it states that you‘re not the maintainer,
> jfyi.
> Should I describe the issue to https://pagure.io/releng/issues or is this
> only possible for you? As I do not have the knowledge to branch and build,
> I‘d like to support your work by doing at least in the paperwork for you.

only the oficial package "owner" can request the branch, so I started the "Non-responsive maintainer check" for till

Bug 2122447 - Non-responsive maintainer check for till

Comment 6 Filipe Rosset 2022-08-31 02:23:21 UTC
requested new branch for epel9 -> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/47181

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-08-31 22:07:51 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aba192e3bb has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aba192e3bb

Comment 8 Filipe Rosset 2022-08-31 22:12:55 UTC
update released

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-09-01 10:40:57 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aba192e3bb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aba192e3bb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 tasmanian 2022-09-04 19:15:34 UTC
Thank you for building bindfs! You helped me a lot!

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-09-09 12:04:53 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aba192e3bb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.