Bug 2118067

Summary:	Please branch and build mingw-dlfcn for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Orion Poplawski <orion>
Component:	mingw-dlfcn	Assignee:	greg.hellings
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	elima, epel-packagers-sig, erik-fedora, greg.hellings, marcandre.lureau, rjones
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	mingw-dlfcn-1.3.1-1.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-02-20 00:39:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2118062, 2164674

Description Orion Poplawski 2022-08-13 21:42:10 UTC

Please branch and build mingw-dlfcn in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain mingw-dlfcn in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-dlfcn/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: orion).

Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90769959

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2023-01-26 02:49:01 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build mingw-dlfcn in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96690699
is successful.

Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2023-01-26 08:55:53 UTC

I have added commit access to epel-packagers-sig:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-dlfcn/settings#usersgroups-tab

Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2023-02-07 14:53:25 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 38 development cycle.
Changing version to 38.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2023-02-11 05:09:16 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-05b8d636cf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-05b8d636cf

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2023-02-12 02:05:24 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-05b8d636cf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-05b8d636cf

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-02-20 00:39:53 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-05b8d636cf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.