Bug 2119277

Summary:	sdl2 version of Tux Paint requires SDL2_Pango
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	dolphin6k
Component:	tuxpaint	Assignee:	Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	37	CC:	cbm, gwync, steve
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	tuxpaint-0.9.28-3.fc37 tuxpaint-0.9.28-3.fc36	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-09-14 00:20:28 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2119499
Bug Blocks:

Description dolphin6k 2022-08-18 07:29:45 UTC

Description of problem:

  Current build (0.9.28 sdl2) does not use SDL2_Pango which causes a problem that the application does not render UI texts properly in many languages environments.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

  tuxpaint-0.9.28-2.fc37

How reproducible:

  Always

Additional info:

  SDL2_Pango is maintained by Mark K. Kim on the following github repo.

  https://github.com/markuskimius/SDL2_Pango

  For compiling tuxpaint-0.9.28-sdl2 with above SDL2_Pango, it might be neccessary to add 'CFLAGS=-I/usr/include/freetype2' as a parameter for 'make'.

Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2022-08-18 16:50:21 UTC

Thanks, submitted for review.

Comment 2 dolphin6k 2022-08-20 22:53:01 UTC

Applying following patch would be better than workaround I mentioned above.

  https://sourceforge.net/p/tuxpaint/tuxpaint/ci/633a3628d6fad0406c028a5c79baa6e1d77ca228/

See also:

  https://sourceforge.net/p/tuxpaint/mailman/message/37696031/

Comment 3 dolphin6k 2022-08-20 23:05:41 UTC

I tested the src.rpm on fedora36.

It works fine with tuxpaint-0.9.28-sdl2.

Only one comment is that autoconf, automake and libtool are not necessarily required to build it.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2022-08-22 15:13:46 UTC

Thank you!

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-09-06 21:01:36 UTC

FEDORA-2022-ce44fec75d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ce44fec75d

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-09-06 21:01:56 UTC

FEDORA-2022-83da986f4a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-83da986f4a

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-09-07 07:38:31 UTC

FEDORA-2022-ce44fec75d has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-ce44fec75d`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ce44fec75d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-09-07 10:50:54 UTC

FEDORA-2022-83da986f4a has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-83da986f4a`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-83da986f4a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-09-14 00:20:28 UTC

FEDORA-2022-ce44fec75d has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-09-15 01:54:15 UTC

FEDORA-2022-83da986f4a has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.