Bug 2120093

Summary:	Please branch and build python-pcodedmp for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Arne Reiter <redhat>
Component:	python-pcodedmp	Assignee:	Michal Ambroz <rebus>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	rebus, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-pcodedmp-1.2.6-16.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-12-04 01:56:04 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2120094

Description Arne Reiter 2022-08-21 16:20:01 UTC

Description of problem:
There is no build of python-pcodedmp for RHEL 9. Please branch and build python-pcodedmp for EPEL 9.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.2.6-13

Additional info:
The current rawhide branch of this package builds successfully against `epel9`. 

Build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/areiter/centos-stream-9-extra/build/4751674/

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2022-08-23 21:20:50 UTC

Honestly, I am not really keen on this, because python-pcodedmp depends on python-oletools, which depends on python-msoffcrypto, which is part of msoffcrypto-tool. And msoffcrypto-tool switched from setup.py to poetry.toml, which didn't feel RHEL-8-friendly during packaging the last time I had a look to it. So, yes, the current package chain rebuilds, but it isn't future-oriented from my point of view.

Are you maybe interested in becoming a co-maintainer and working on it in the future?

Comment 2 Michal Ambroz 2022-11-07 21:58:24 UTC

Hello Robert, 
I volunteer to maintain python-pcodedmp for epel9 (along with the oletools where I am already maintainer).
Please can you add me as comaintainer (especially to rawhide + epel9 branches) ?
Thank you.
Michal Ambroz

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2022-11-07 23:45:41 UTC

I've added you as co-maintainer - thank you!

Comment 4 Michal Ambroz 2022-11-29 23:26:19 UTC

requesting epel9 branch https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49587

Comment 5 Michal Ambroz 2022-12-05 12:13:28 UTC

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7861/94757861/root.log

DEBUG util.py:443:  No matching package to install: 'python3-oletools >= 0.54'
DEBUG util.py:443:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:443:  Error: Some packages could not be found.

round dependency to python3-oletools

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-11-25 21:38:31 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ee1ced88b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ee1ced88b

Comment 7 Michal Ambroz 2023-11-25 21:40:19 UTC

bootstraped oletools+pcodedmp for epel9, please test

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-11-26 03:37:42 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ee1ced88b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ee1ced88b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Arne Reiter 2023-11-29 07:51:31 UTC

The test for Fedora EPEL 9 of the package python-pcodedmp has been successfully completed.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2023-12-04 01:56:04 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ee1ced88b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.