Bug 2120450
| Summary: | Review Request: golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3 - v3 import path of twpayne-vfs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Anthony Rabbito <hello> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | hello, mikel, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: |
If this bug requires documentation, please select an appropriate Doc Type value.
|
|
| Last Closed: | 2022-10-05 23:18:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2120454 | ||
|
Description
Anthony Rabbito
2022-08-23 02:01:35 UTC
Updated spec to use `gometa -f` Spec URL: https://anthr76.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3/golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3.spec SRPM URL: https://anthr76.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3/golang-github-twpayne-vfs-3-3.0.0-1.fc37.src.rpm Spec is correct, but I've one doubt. Diff between v3 and v4 has not any relevant change over previous version: https://github.com/twpayne/go-vfs/compare/v3.0.0...v4.1.0 I've checked if xdg-v6 package could work with go-vfs-v4 and, as expected, works fine. https://github.com/twpayne/go-xdg/pull/7 I see three options: a) Package go-vfs-v3 as-is in this BZ b) Package go-vfs-v4 and patch xdg-v6 to switch (sed or patch) from go-vfs-v3 to go-vfs-v4 c) Package go-vfs non versioned, and modify xdg-v6 spec to replace dependency of go-vfs I would go with option b, so in case any other package depends on it can use the latest version, but as you prefer. Now I see that chezmoi itself depends on go-vfs-v4 and that a review is pending for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2120452 Based on this, please, go with option b, close this BZ and we go with BZ2120452. Sure Mikel. We will go with option B Thank you very much for the upstream patch. Cheers! |