Bug 2124546
Summary: | Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Davide Cavalca <davide> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mbishop, michel, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | michel:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-10-11 10:28:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Davide Cavalca
2022-09-06 13:11:48 UTC
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91699155 This is an updated version of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953243 Issues: ======= - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/duo_unix/LICENSE See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files => harmless. though maybe just do '%license LICENSE' and delete the file in %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/ ? - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. Note: openssl1.1-devel is deprecated, you must not depend on it. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/deprecating-packages/ => oh this can be an issue - please update to depending on openssl-devel, I just checked locally and it works fine - please add a %check section. `sudo make check` seems to work fine (yes it fails if sudo is not used, sigh) so you might want to disable the tests that involve writing to pam.d - the crypto tests don't require it Exception: Permission denied opening pam.d make sure you run tests with elevated permissions Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/duo_unix/duo_unix.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/duo_unix/duo_unix-1.12.1-2.fc38.src.rpm Changelog: - Update openssl BR - Fix duplicate license file - Add check section and conditionally run tests Changes look good. APPROVED (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/duo_unix FEDORA-2022-04897a2ade has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-04897a2ade FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0af92cee1f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0af92cee1f FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d49b7dddf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d49b7dddf FEDORA-2022-04897a2ade has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-04897a2ade \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-04897a2ade See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d49b7dddf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d49b7dddf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0af92cee1f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0af92cee1f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0af92cee1f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d49b7dddf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. Removing `pam_duo` from the `duo_unix` package is a divergence from the original Duo package. Since both packages are named `duo_unix` and EPEL packages have a higher priority than third-party repositories, this `duo_unix` will override one from Duo causing unexpected behavior and possibly a system lockout if a user is protecting logins with `pam_duo`. Suggested solutions are: Include `pam_duo` as a part of this package. Rename this package to `login_duo` to avoid conflicting with the upstream package repository Thanks for the report Mark, I've moved that to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134160 for ease of tracking. FEDORA-2022-0c3d3eca33 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |