Bug 2125147
| Summary: | [Backport to 4.11] [GSS]toleration for "non-ocs" taints OpenShift Data Foundation pods | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Bipin Kunal <bkunal> | |
| Component: | odf-operator | Assignee: | Nitin Goyal <nigoyal> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Shrivaibavi Raghaventhiran <sraghave> | |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | urgent | |||
| Version: | 4.10 | CC: | agantony, bkunal, jarrpa, khover, kramdoss, madam, mbukatov, mhackett, mrajanna, muagarwa, nbecker, ndevos, nigoyal, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, rar, r.martinez, sheggodu, sostapov, sraghave, tdesala, tnielsen, uchapaga, usrivast | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression | |
| Target Release: | ODF 4.11.2 | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: |
Previously, in OpenShift Data Foundation 4.10 and 4.11 versions, the `odf-operator` removed the taints (non-ocs) in the subscriptions that were changed or edited. This prevented the scheduling of the pods. With this update, the `odf-operator` does not remove the taints from the subscriptions.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 2122980 | |||
| : | 2125150 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-10-11 15:06:12 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | 2122980 | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2125150 | |||
|
Comment 12
Shrivaibavi Raghaventhiran
2022-10-06 12:56:22 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.11.2 Bug Fix Update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:6888 |