Bug 2130937

Summary:	Memory exhaustion when editing a cropped photo
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Kamil Páral <kparal>
Component:	gnome-photos	Assignee:	GNOME SIG Unassigned <gnome-sig>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	37	CC:	awilliam, debarshir, fzatlouk, gnome-sig, pranav913, robatino
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-03-13 08:24:37 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2009540

Description Kamil Páral 2022-09-29 13:56:06 UTC

This bug is only created for blocker-related purposes. Please read the upstream issue here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-photos/-/issues/205

Proposing as an F37 blocker, in case this functionality is considered a basic functionality:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality

Comment 1 František Zatloukal 2022-10-03 17:21:35 UTC

Discussed during the 2022-10-03 blocker review meeting: [1]

The decision to classify this bug as an AcceptedFreezeException and to punt decision on blocker status was made:

"We want to get more consensus on whether or not to classify this as a blocker through more testing. We accept it as an FE."

[1] https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2022-10-03/f37-blocker-review.2022-10-03-16.00.log.txt

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2022-10-10 08:50:30 UTC

-7 blocker in https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/931 , rejected as a blocker.

Comment 3 Kamil Páral 2023-03-13 08:24:37 UTC

Closing in favor of bug 2176043. (Because both of them have specific blocker-related fields, I'm not going to close as duplicates, that would complicate things).