Bug 213746
| Summary: | LVMs "disappear" during installation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jean Francois Martinez <jfm512> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6 | CC: | triage |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-05-06 16:40:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jean Francois Martinez
2006-11-02 20:31:41 UTC
Can you provide the dump that you received? What dump? If you are referring to the list of mounted volumes with /dev mounted two times I redid the installation and this disn't reproduce so either the second /dev was alreday ujnmounted when I checked, or I figured it out. In case I didn't my memory is that the second /dev mounted was at the end of the list when I did a mount. However what was _very_ reproducible is that installation did not complete: it went to the checking dependencies phase then the preparing to install phase, then to the next screen with the progress bar about installed software and at this point it failed. By shifting around virtual consoles I saw that mkfs had been unable to find the /dev/Vgroup/Lvolume file. PS: I started install from a situation where machine had only ordinary partitions, and one of them was deleted to make an LVM one from it. 256MB of memory is the mimimum required for installation. Even in those cases, you should run the text mode installer. Try rawhide or a Fedora 7 test release and see if the problem has been solved. requested by Jams Antill Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |