Bug 2144680

Summary:	request epel 9 branch for clblast
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Tom Rix <trix>
Component:	clblast	Assignee:	Tom Rix <trix>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	loganjerry
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	clblast-1.5.3-2.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-12-18 00:43:12 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tom Rix 2022-11-22 00:53:10 UTC

Description of problem:
clblast builds as-is for epel9 and needs some modification for testing. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. from rawhide
2. apply this pr
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clblast/pull-request/2
 
3.

Actual results:
rawhide build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94406714
x86_64 continues to test

epel9 build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94406142

manual testing on rhel 9 with
> clinfo 
Number of platforms                               1
  Platform Name                                   NVIDIA CUDA
  Platform Vendor                                 NVIDIA Corporation
  Platform Version                                OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.8.88

and manually building --with check
...

49/53 Test #34: clblast_test_xgemm .................   Passed  116.08 sec
50/53 Test #49: clblast_test_xgemmbatched ..........   Passed   97.17 sec
51/53 Test #46: clblast_test_xcol2im ...............   Passed  165.93 sec
52/53 Test #45: clblast_test_xim2col ...............   Passed  170.89 sec
53/53 Test #47: clblast_test_xconvgemm .............   Passed  184.80 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 53

...

Expected results:


Additional info:
Add me to the project if you need help with epel.

Comment 1 Tom Rix 2022-12-03 17:51:58 UTC

Do you need help ?

Comment 2 Jerry James 2022-12-05 22:59:52 UTC

Hi Tom.  At first I was waiting for you to respond to my comment on your PR (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clblast/pull-request/2).  Then the motherboard in my computer suddenly decided it had worked enough and wanted to take an early retirement.  I've been gathering parts and have finally managed to build myself a shiny new computer.  No more parts from 2013!  But now I'm waaaaay behind on Fedora-related emails.  Please excuse me while I try to catch up.

But I see you still haven't responded on the PR.  Could you do that first, please?

Comment 3 Jerry James 2022-12-07 17:41:01 UTC

I'm still trying to catch up on things, so sorry for the delay.  I've added you as an administrator.

Comment 4 Tom Rix 2022-12-07 18:14:45 UTC

Ok, i'll ask for epel9 branch.
I was impressed enough with clblast that I am asking to add it's related project cltune
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151654
If you want one more things to do, I would appreciate a package review.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-12-09 17:40:01 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-10 02:32:06 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-12-18 00:43:12 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.