Bug 2144680 - request epel 9 branch for clblast
Summary: request epel 9 branch for clblast
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: clblast
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom Rix
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-11-22 00:53 UTC by Tom Rix
Modified: 2022-12-18 00:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: clblast-1.5.3-2.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-18 00:43:12 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tom Rix 2022-11-22 00:53:10 UTC
Description of problem:
clblast builds as-is for epel9 and needs some modification for testing. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. from rawhide
2. apply this pr
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clblast/pull-request/2
 
3.

Actual results:
rawhide build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94406714
x86_64 continues to test

epel9 build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94406142

manual testing on rhel 9 with
> clinfo 
Number of platforms                               1
  Platform Name                                   NVIDIA CUDA
  Platform Vendor                                 NVIDIA Corporation
  Platform Version                                OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.8.88

and manually building --with check
...

49/53 Test #34: clblast_test_xgemm .................   Passed  116.08 sec
50/53 Test #49: clblast_test_xgemmbatched ..........   Passed   97.17 sec
51/53 Test #46: clblast_test_xcol2im ...............   Passed  165.93 sec
52/53 Test #45: clblast_test_xim2col ...............   Passed  170.89 sec
53/53 Test #47: clblast_test_xconvgemm .............   Passed  184.80 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 53

...

Expected results:


Additional info:
Add me to the project if you need help with epel.

Comment 1 Tom Rix 2022-12-03 17:51:58 UTC
Do you need help ?

Comment 2 Jerry James 2022-12-05 22:59:52 UTC
Hi Tom.  At first I was waiting for you to respond to my comment on your PR (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clblast/pull-request/2).  Then the motherboard in my computer suddenly decided it had worked enough and wanted to take an early retirement.  I've been gathering parts and have finally managed to build myself a shiny new computer.  No more parts from 2013!  But now I'm waaaaay behind on Fedora-related emails.  Please excuse me while I try to catch up.

But I see you still haven't responded on the PR.  Could you do that first, please?

Comment 3 Jerry James 2022-12-07 17:41:01 UTC
I'm still trying to catch up on things, so sorry for the delay.  I've added you as an administrator.

Comment 4 Tom Rix 2022-12-07 18:14:45 UTC
Ok, i'll ask for epel9 branch.
I was impressed enough with clblast that I am asking to add it's related project cltune
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151654
If you want one more things to do, I would appreciate a package review.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-12-09 17:40:01 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-10 02:32:06 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-12-18 00:43:12 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9e1f97b3f2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.