Bug 2152687

Summary: [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for python-stevedor
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Pat Riehecky <riehecky>
Component: python-stevedoreAssignee: Alfredo Moralejo <amoralej>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: amoralej, apevec, dprince, mrunge, openstack-sig
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-stevedore-4.0.2-1.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-22 00:30:45 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2126152    

Description Pat Riehecky 2022-12-12 17:20:51 UTC
Description of problem:

Can python-stevedor be branched for EPEL9?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Alfredo Moralejo 2022-12-13 09:47:04 UTC
Branch requested in https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49853

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2022-12-13 17:44:05 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ed51a63544 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ed51a63544

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2022-12-14 00:21:31 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ed51a63544 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ed51a63544

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-12-22 00:30:45 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ed51a63544 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.