Bug 2157801

Summary: Review Request: ladybird - Truly independent web browser
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: ngompa13, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-12-22 00:45:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Davide Cavalca 2023-01-03 02:09:42 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/serenity.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/serenity-0^20230102git65b420f-1.fc38.src.rpm

Description:
SerenityOS is a graphical Unix-like operating system for x86-64 computers.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2023-01-03 02:09:45 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95732205

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2023-01-03 02:11:48 UTC
Some notes:
- this package is only building ladybird and lagom for now, but I structured it in a way to make it easier to add other parts of SerenityOS in the future if they get ported
- serenity technically builds with GCC, but it reliably OOMs every machine I own, so I forced it to clang for now
- there's already a serenity package at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/serenity but it's been retired for over 12 years and I can't find any reference to the upstream, so it's probably ok to take it over for this

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2023-01-03 02:14:20 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 4 Package Review 2024-01-04 00:45:27 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 5 Neal Gompa 2024-01-04 03:59:19 UTC
Still working on this.

Comment 6 Davide Cavalca 2024-06-05 18:42:36 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/ladybird.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/ladybird-0^20240605gitc790413-1.fc41.src.rpm

Changelog:
- rename and rebase onto the new ladybird upstream

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2024-06-05 19:06:16 UTC
> # GCC consistently OOMs at link stage due to LTO, use clang instead
> %global toolchain clang

Wouldn't %limit_build work to fix this?

Comment 8 Package Review 2025-06-06 00:45:22 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 9 Package Review 2025-07-19 00:45:55 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.

Comment 10 Neal Gompa 2025-07-19 18:28:38 UTC
It looks like Ladybird has been forked out of SerenityOS sources, so this needs updating to account for that.

https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird

Comment 11 Neal Gompa 2025-07-19 18:29:03 UTC
Ah that already happened, but the SPEC and SRPM are no longer available?

Comment 12 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 12:57:24 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 13 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 13:05:45 UTC
There seems to be some problem with the following file.
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/ladybird-0%5E20240605gitc790413-1.fc41.src.rpm
Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error.
Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 14 Neal Gompa 2025-11-21 09:17:51 UTC
The files are no longer available, can you refresh this and make them available for review?

Comment 15 Package Review 2025-12-22 00:45:21 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.