Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/serenity.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/serenity-0^20230102git65b420f-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: SerenityOS is a graphical Unix-like operating system for x86-64 computers. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95732205
Some notes: - this package is only building ladybird and lagom for now, but I structured it in a way to make it easier to add other parts of SerenityOS in the future if they get ported - serenity technically builds with GCC, but it reliably OOMs every machine I own, so I forced it to clang for now - there's already a serenity package at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/serenity but it's been retired for over 12 years and I can't find any reference to the upstream, so it's probably ok to take it over for this
Taking this review.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.
Still working on this.
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/ladybird.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/ladybird-0^20240605gitc790413-1.fc41.src.rpm Changelog: - rename and rebase onto the new ladybird upstream
> # GCC consistently OOMs at link stage due to LTO, use clang instead > %global toolchain clang Wouldn't %limit_build work to fix this?
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.
It looks like Ladybird has been forked out of SerenityOS sources, so this needs updating to account for that. https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird
Ah that already happened, but the SPEC and SRPM are no longer available?
Hello, I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer. If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my apologies, feel free to close it. [fedora-review-service-build]
There seems to be some problem with the following file. SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/serenity/ladybird-0%5E20240605gitc790413-1.fc41.src.rpm Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error. Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
The files are no longer available, can you refresh this and make them available for review?
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.