Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||libgdiplus duplicates symbols from libcairo|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Joe Orton <jorton>|
|Component:||libgdiplus||Assignee:||Xavier Lamien <lxtnow>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-07-14 10:27:42 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||216170, 235705|
Description Joe Orton 2006-11-17 09:21:09 EST
Description of problem: Clashes for /usr/lib/libgdiplus.so.0.0.0: with /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2.9.2 => cairo_append_path cairo_new_path (...214 symbols omitted...) cairo_get_operator looks like a statically linked copy of libcairo - is there a reason why the system copy isn't used, or otherwise why this copy is exported? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libgdiplus-1.1.17-1.fc6.i386
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2006-11-17 12:21:03 EST
Comment 2 Alexander Larsson 2006-11-20 12:18:39 EST
I think it has a copy of an older (API-incompatible version) of cairo. But i think upstream is working on using the system version now.
Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2006-11-22 11:46:28 EST
Do you have an upstream bug reference for that work ?
Comment 4 Alexander Larsson 2006-11-23 04:46:12 EST
No, its just something i think i saw at some point.
Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2007-04-13 19:33:13 EDT
Not going to be fixed in time for FC7
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2007-10-12 15:01:23 EDT
I see upstream svn now has the configure.in parts for using system cairo no longer commented out (but still marked as "unsupported")
Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2008-05-13 22:28:38 EDT
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 8 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 18:21:07 EDT
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2009-07-14 10:27:42 EDT
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.