Bug 217239 (arrows)

Summary: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Hans de Goede <hdegoede>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Christopher Stone <chris.stone>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-11-25 21:17:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Hans de Goede 2006-11-25 15:38:54 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description:
It's a maze game of sorts. Guide the spinning blue thing through
the maze of arrows, creating and destroying arrows as necessary
to collect the green things.

Comment 1 Christopher Stone 2006-11-25 17:41:59 UTC
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec filename matches %{name}
- package meets Packaging Guidelines
- package licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license file included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec is legible
- sources match upstream
d6cf52ff319c295b9fb6982c023ec7f0  arrows-0.6.tar.gz
- successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
X package uses a directory it doesnt create and I cannot determine if its pulled
in from Requires packages.
This package puts an icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- package contains proper %clean
- macro usage consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- %doc does not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no devel subpackage required
- no .la files
O desktop file installed properly
(although see my comment in SHOULD fix)
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages

==== MUST FIX ====
- Shouldn't this require some package to get the icon dir?  If not, please tell
me how I determine which Requires would pull this in.  Perhaps Require:
gnome-icon-theme?  Or hicolor-icon-theme if you decide to move this out of the
GNOME menu (see SHOULD FIX section).

==== SHOULD FIX ====
- I'm not sure I agree all games compiled with gtk2 should be placed under
GNOME->Games.  I think GNOME->Games should be for games that are distributed
with GNOME much like KDE has their kde-games package.  This may require further
discussion on the fedora-games-list.  Not a blocker.

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2006-11-25 20:37:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> ==== MUST FIX ====
> - Shouldn't this require some package to get the icon dir?  If not, please tell
> me how I determine which Requires would pull this in.  Perhaps Require:
> gnome-icon-theme?  Or hicolor-icon-theme if you decide to move this out of the
> GNOME menu (see SHOULD FIX section).
> 

Yes it should have a "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme", my bad , fixed.

> ==== SHOULD FIX ====
> - I'm not sure I agree all games compiled with gtk2 should be placed under
> GNOME->Games.  I think GNOME->Games should be for games that are distributed
> with GNOME much like KDE has their kde-games package.  This may require further
> discussion on the fedora-games-list.  Not a blocker.

I took that GNOME entry in the .desktop over from the package on which I based
mine, but I agree it isn't a gnome app, dropped.

New version here:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm


Comment 3 Christopher Stone 2006-11-25 20:57:28 UTC
All MUST/SHOULD items fixed.

Please re-check scummvm spec for icon issue mentioned here, I might have missed
this on my review of scummvm.

APPROVED.

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2006-11-25 21:17:24 UTC
Thanks, imported and build, closing.

p.s.

scummvm is fine.